Genecology and Gene Resource Management Strategies for Conifer Cold Hardiness

By S. Aitken, M. Hannerz. 2001

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Frost hardiness vs. growth performance in trembling aspen: an experimental test of assisted migration (2013, background): “This is a consequence of tradeoffs between maximizing growth by fully utilizing the available growing season, and avoiding injury or mortality due to late spring or early autumn frosts (Loehle 1998; Aitken & Hannerz 2001; Leinonen & H€anninen 2002; Koehler, Center & Cavender-Bares 2012).”
Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling adaptive traits in coastal Douglas-fir. IV. Cold-hardiness QTL verification and candidate gene mapping (2005, methodology): “The genetics of cold-hardiness in Douglas-fir has been welldocumented using traditional quantitative and genecological test populations and artificial freeze tests (Aitken and Adams 1995, 1996, 1997; Anekonda et al. 1998, 2000a, b; Aitken and Hannerz 2000; O’Neill et al. 2000, 2001).”
From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees (2003, background): “Bud set exhibits more genetic variation than does bud flush, both among populations and individuals (Aitken and Hannerz 2001; Howe et al. 2000).”