Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis valid for Turkey?
By Lokman Gunduz *, Abdulnasser Hatemi-J. 2005
621 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/643193c20b4d66faebff7614009518bc019f8ab6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Ilhan Ozturk
- Sakiru Adebola Solarin
- C. Tang
- Mehdi Ben Jebli
- Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
- Eyup Dogan
- Alper Aslan
In Sociology and Political Science
- Juan Gabriel Brida
- Manuela Pulina
- I. Cortés-Jiménez
- C. Tang
- Salah Abosedra
- Fernanda Strozzi
- N. Comerio
- María del Pópulo Pablo-Romero
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the importance of international tourism for the Turkish economy: A social accounting matrix analysis (2012, background): “Among these, Gunduz and Hatemi-J (2005), Bahar (2006), Kaplan and Celik (2008), and Zortuk (2009) found that tourism had a positive impact on GDP growth whereas Katircioglu (2009) rejected the tourism-led * Tel.”
- Small sample evidence on the tourism-led growth hypothesis in Lebanon (2014, background): “However, Hakkio and Rush (1991) articulated cointegration as a concept of a long-run relationship; thus the cointegration results may not change by merely changing the frequency of the data. Moreover, Tang (2008) affirms the idea that interpolated data do not enhance the statistical power of a test.”
- A literature review on the tourism-led-growth hypothesis (2010, neutral): “The most popular destinations analysed are Turkey, Spain and Italy.”
- Tourism Specialization, Absorptive Capacity, and Economic Growth (2017, background): “While the empirical evidence in favor of the tourism-led growth hypothesis is mounting (see, inter alia, Gunduz and Hatemi 2005; Hye and Khan 2013; Oh 2005; Tang and Tan 2013, 2015; Tosun 1999; and the recent reviews by Brida, 1Centre for Business in Society, Coventry University, Coventry, United…”
- Has the tourism-led growth hypothesis been validated? A literature review (2016, methodology): “…Adige and South Tyrol, Italy (Brida & Risso, 2010; Brida et al., 2010; Brida & Giuliani, 2013), Italy (Cortés-Jiménez & Pulina, 2010), Turkey (Gunduz & Hatemi-J, 2005; Husein & Kara, 2011; Kaplan & Çelik, 2008), Greece (Dritsakis, 2004), Spain (Balaguer & Cantavella-Jordà, 2002;…”
- Urban-rural imbalance and Tourism-Led Growth in China (2017, neutral): “Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Annals of Tourism Research journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/ locate/atoures (Gunduz & Hatemi-J, 2005; Inchausti-Sintes, 2015; Zhao & Mao, 2013; Zhou, 2011).”
- Does tourism degrade environmental quality? A comparative study of Eastern and Western European Union (2017, background): “…(2002) for Spain, Durbarry (2002) for Mauritius, Dritsakis (2004) for Greece, Eugenio-Martin et al. (2004) for 21 Latin American countries, Gunduz and Hatemi-J (2005) for Turkey, Narayan et al. (2010) for 4 Pacific Island countries, Dritsakis (2012) for Italy and CárdenasGarcía et al.…”
- On the Causality Between Tourism Growth and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Turkey (2009, background): “Gunduz and Hatemi-J (2005) found a unidirectional causality between the international tourist arrivals and the economic growth of Turkey, and empirically confirmed the TLGH. Kim et al. (2006) pointed to the bidirectional causality between international tourism and economic growth in Taiwan.”
- Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools (2018, background): “…2004; Kim et al., 2006; Oh, 2005; Rakotondramaro and Andriamasy, 2016; Shahzad et al., 2017; Tang and Abosedra, 2014; Tang and Tan, 2015), but also with mixed findings even analysing the same country, as in the case of Turkey (Gunduz and Hatemi, 2005; Katircioglu, 2009; Ongan and Demiroz, 2005).”
- Tourism, trade and growth: the case of Cyprus (2009, background): “…trade and economic growth (especially, trade-led, export-led and import-led growth hypotheses), but this cannot be said about empirical relationship between international tourism and economic growth (Gunduz and Hatemi-J, 2005), and even between international tourism and international trade.”
- Tourism-led Growth Hypothesis in the Top Ten Tourist Destinations: New Evidence Using the Quantile-on-Quantile Approach (2017, positive): “…prior literature for a wide range of countries and can be justified by the multiple beneficial effects of tourism on the economy of a country (e.g.,Balaguer and Cantavella-Jordá, 2002; Chen and Chiou-Wei, 2009; Cortés-Jiménez and Pulina, 2010; Gunduz and Hatemi-J, 2005; Ridderstaat et al., 2014).”
- The impacts of tourism, energy consumption and political instability on economic growth in the MENA countries (2014, methodology): “Using the cointegration and Granger causality tests, Balaguer and Cantavella-Jordá (2002) for Spain, Gunduz and Hatemi-J (2005) for Turkey, Belloumi (2010) for Tunisia, Akinboade and Braimoh (2010) for South Africa, Brida et al. (2010) for Uruguay, Katircioğlu (2010) for Singapore, Lean and Tang (20”
- The dynamic causal links between CO2 emissions from transport, real GDP, energy use and international tourism (2018, methodology): “countries: Oh (2005) for the Korean economy, Gunduz and Hatemi-J (2005) and Ozturk and Acaravci (2009) for the case of Turkey, Tang and”
- Tourism and Growth in a Cross Section of Countries (2010, positive): “In particular, Balaguer and Cantavella-Jordà (2002), Dritsakis (2004), Durbarry (2004), Gunduz and Hatemi (2005) and Kim et al (2006) use timeseries analyses to analyse the impact of tourism on economic growth in Spain, Mauritius, Greece, Turkey and Taiwan, respectively, and all conclude that there…”
- Corporate governance, tourism growth and firm performance: Evidence from publicly listed tourism firms in five Middle Eastern countries (2014, background): “Gunduz and Hatemi-J (2005) investigate this issue in Turkey and support a positive impact of tourism development on economic growth.”