Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order

By R. Gilpin. 2001

571 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/642a073a24273bc4a0ce199bc56ed4ea3bce1cad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

War, Peace, and the Invisible Hand: Positive Political Externalities of Economic Globalization (2003, result): “Critics of this view (Waltz, 1999; Gilpin, 2001) cite the limited nature and geographical distribution of integration in recent years compared with that of the late 19th century.”
The Return of the State? (2011, background): “R. Gilpin (2001) Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 377–403.”
The political economy of tourism development: A critical review (2017, background): “From the outset, political economists have endeavoured to take account of the complex and variable economic, political, social, technological and cultural forces which shape the organisation and dynamics of domestic and international economies (Gilpin, 2001: 40).”
Globalization as ‘Galton's Problem’: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development (2006, background): “…1990s but then decreased it to the level of 1990 again, the lowspending countries increased the share of social expenditure so that in 2000 the 17+ Gilpin 2001, 365+ 18+ Swank 2002, 72; see also Garrett 1998, 76–78; and Garrett and Mitchell 2001+ 19+ Swank 2002, 119–20+ 20+ Huber and Stephens…”
Political uncertainty and stock market volatility in the Middle East and North African (MENA) countries (2014, background): “This in turn suggests that financial asset price movement is driven, at least in part, by political events in addition to the common financial and economic factors (Gilpin, 2001).”
US–China Relations: Nationalism, the Trade War, and COVID-19 (2020, background): “He further argues, it “recognizes the anarchic nature of international affairs, the primacy of the state 1 3 and its interests in international affairs, and the importance of power in interstate relations” (Gilpin 2001, 14).”
Examining the causal impacts of tourism, globalization, economic growth and carbon emissions in tourism island territories: bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis (2018, unknown): “…others has been extensively researched (see Beck, 2000; Berger, 2002; Dicken, 1992; Featherstone, 1995; Friedman, 1999; Gaburro & O’Boyle, 2003; Gilpin, 2001; Keohane, 2002; Laidi & Costopoulos, 2002; Langhorne, 2001; Overland, 2016; Robertson, 1992; Shahbaz, Mallick, Mahalik, & Loganathan,…”