The LIGO Scientific Collaboration

By G. González. 2015

1,160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/642063b1a7b12e47d913b255c63bd179239c2c8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Tests of general relativity with GWTC-3 (2021, unknown): “We perform Bayesian parameter estimation using either the Python -based package bilby [138, 139] or the software library LALInference [140], which belongs to the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Algorithm Library Suite [141].”
Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects (2018, background): “In August 2017 the second observing run (O2) of the detectors aLIGO [1] and Virgo [2] ended, and to date O1 and O2 have resulted in the publication of six likely binary black hole (BBH) [3–7] merger events, and the joint GW-electromagnetic observation of a pair of merging NSs [8,9].”
Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. III. Future prospect (2017, methodology): “7× 10 eV [3], and we cannot expect the significant improvement of the graviton mass bound in aLIGO era.”
Bayesian inference for spectral estimation of gravitational wave detector noise (2014, background): “Gravitational wave data from ground based observatories such as LIGO [1] and Virgo [2] are dominated by instrument noise.”
GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State. (2018, background): “The post-merger signal, while rich in content, is also difficult to observe, with current detector sensitivities being limited due to photon shot noise [1] at the high frequencies of interest.”
GW170817: Implications for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Compact Binary Coalescences (2017, background): “—On 17 August 2017, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) [1] Scientific and Virgo [2] Collaborations detected a new gravitational-wave source: the coalescence of two neutron stars [3].”
Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226 (2016, background): “(4)This is even more so for binary NS mergers, another primary target for aLIGO [30], which are expected to have lower masses than BHs and thus merge at even higher frequencies.”
Towards understanding astrophysical effects of nuclear symmetry energy (2019, methodology): “Perhaps well known to everybody at least in the physics community, the two historically most defining events directly verifying GR predictions are so far (1) the first detection of gravitational waves from the inward spiral and merger of a pair of black holes of around 36 M⊙ and 29 M⊙ and the subseq”
Merger and Mass Ejection of Neutron Star Binaries (2019, background): “Mergers of neutron-star binaries [binary neutron stars and black hole-neutron star (BH-NS) binaries] are one of the most promising sources of gravitational waves (GWs) for groundbased detectors, such as Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, and KAGRA (1, 2, 3).”
Merger rate of primordial black-hole binaries (2017, background): “The LIGO Scientific Collaboration searched for such mergers in LIGO’s second science run [40], but could only set upper bounds on the merger rate three to four orders of magnitude larger than NSTT’s prediction if PBHs make all of the dark matter.”
Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole mergers (2017, methodology): “We then compute mismatches using the advanced LIGO design sensitivity noise curve [51,52] using various total masses M.”
Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration (2020, methodology): “” The accuracy and precision of h are important for detecting gravitational wave signals and crucial for the reconstruction of their astrophysical parameters [9, 10, 11].”
GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral (2017, methodology): “Data used in this study can be found in [80].”
Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (2020, unknown): “A majority of the tests presented in this paper are performed using the LALI nference code [116] in the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Algorithm Library Suite (LALS uite ) [117].”
Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation (2015, background): “Our approach has always * Corresponding address: USC Information Sciences Institute, 4676 Admiralty Way Suite 1001, Marina del Rey, CA, USA, 90292 Email addresses: deelman@isi.edu (Ewa Deelman), vahi@isi.edu (Karan Vahi), gideon@isi.edu (Gideon Juve), rynge@isi.edu (Mats Rynge), scottcal@usc.edu (Sc”
Dark Sectors and New, Light, Weakly-Coupled Particles (2013, methodology): “We note also that these experiments, although challenging, are feasible using wellestablished technologies developed for example for laser interferometer gravitational-wave detectors [55, 56].”
Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star - black hole systems with advanced ground based gravitational wave detectors (2014, methodology): “This was because the search methods and detector sensitivity at the time did not warrant the inclusion of spin effects [6, 8].”
Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism (2013, background): “It is composed of the LIGO detectors in Hanford, Washington, and Livingston, Louisiana, in the United States; the French-Italian Virgo detector [1]; and the British-German GEO600 detector [2].”