Universal Adversarial Attacks with Natural Triggers for Text Classification

By Liwei Song, Xinwei Yu, Hsuan-Tung Peng, Karthik Narasimhan. 2020

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent work has demonstrated the vulnerability of modern text classifiers to universal adversarial attacks, which are input-agnostic sequences of words added to text processed by classifiers. Despite being successful, the word sequences produced in such attacks are often ungrammatical and can be easily distinguished from natural text. We develop adversarial attacks that appear closer to natural English phrases and yet confuse classification systems when added to benign inputs. We leverage an adversarially regularized autoencoder (ARAE) to generate triggers and propose a gradient-based search that aims to maximize the downstream classifier’s prediction loss. Our attacks effectively reduce model accuracy on classification tasks while being less identifiable than prior models as per automatic detection metrics and human-subject studies. Our aim is to demonstrate that adversarial attacks can be made harder to detect than previously thought and to enable the development of appropriate defenses.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Douwe Kiela
  2. Ethan Perez
  3. Alexandre Sablayrolles
  4. Geoffrey Irving
  5. Dian Yu
  6. Kenji Sagae
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Herv'e J'egou

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Ethan Perez
  2. Kenji Sagae
  3. Dian Yu
  4. Douwe Kiela
  5. Geoffrey Irving
  6. Chuan Guo
  7. Nat McAleese
  8. Herv'e J'egou

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Ethan Perez
  2. Dylan Hadfield-Menell
  3. Chuan Guo
  4. Nat McAleese
  5. Dian Yu
  6. Herv'e J'egou
  7. Douwe Kiela
  8. Kenji Sagae

Citations in the corpus