Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling

By Ruth Pidsley, Elena Zotenko, Timothy J. Peters, M. Lawrence, G. Risbridger, P. Molloy, Susan Van Djik, B. Muhlhausler, C. Stirzaker, Susan J. Clark. Genome Biology, 2016

1,218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In recent years the Illumina HumanMethylation450 (HM450) BeadChip has provided a user-friendly platform to profile DNA methylation in human samples. However, HM450 lacked coverage of distal regulatory elements. Illumina have now released the MethylationEPIC (EPIC) BeadChip, with new content specifically designed to target these regions. We have used HM450 and whole-genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) to perform a critical evaluation of the new EPIC array platform. EPIC covers over 850,000 CpG sites, including >90 % of the CpGs from the HM450 and an additional 413,743 CpGs. Even though the additional probes improve the coverage of regulatory elements, including 58 % of FANTOM5 enhancers, only 7 % distal and 27 % proximal ENCODE regulatory elements are represented. Detailed comparisons of regulatory elements from EPIC and WGBS show that a single EPIC probe is not always informative for those distal regulatory elements showing variable methylation across the region. However, overall data from the EPIC array at single loci are highly reproducible across technical and biological replicates and demonstrate high correlation with HM450 and WGBS data. We show that the HM450 and EPIC arrays distinguish differentially methylated probes, but the absolute agreement depends on the threshold set for each platform. Finally, we provide an annotated list of probes whose signal could be affected by cross-hybridisation or underlying genetic variation. The EPIC array is a significant improvement over the HM450 array, with increased genome coverage of regulatory regions and high reproducibility and reliability, providing a valuable tool for high-throughput human methylome analyses from diverse clinical samples.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63ee265dd2b1f639b03af20e084e769eb40b0fe4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking (2021, neutral): “8 and 9).”
SeSAMe: reducing artifactual detection of DNA methylation by Infinium BeadChips in genomic deletions (2018, methodology): “Infinium HumanMethylationEPIC IDATs were downloaded from GEO with accession GSE86833 (16).”