Counterexample to a conjecture about braces
By D. Bachiller. 2015
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We find an example of a finite solvable group (in fact, a finite $p$-group) without any left brace structure (equiv. which is not an IYB group). Our argument is an improvement of an argument of Rump, using previous work in other areas of Burde, and of Featherstonhaugh, Caranti and Childs, which we relate to brace theory.
Subfields: Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63df43a774ab8e7dbb720e705e032320b2e88a60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
- Leandro Vendramin
- Ferran Cedó
- Agata Smoktunowicz
- Eric Jespers
- D. Bachiller
- Jan Okninski
- Tatiana Gateva-Ivanova
In Geometry and Topology
- Leandro Vendramin
- Agata Smoktunowicz
- D. Bachiller
- Ferran Cedó
- Eric Jespers
- Jan Okninski
- Tatiana Gateva-Ivanova
- Victoria Lebed
In Mathematical Physics
- Leandro Vendramin
- D. Bachiller
- Agata Smoktunowicz
- Ferran Cedó
- Jan Okninski
- Eric Jespers
- Victoria Lebed
- Tomasz Brzezi'nski
Citations in the corpus
- Problems on skew left braces (2018, methodology): “Left braces of size p2 and p3, where p is a prime number, were classified by Bachiller in [3].”
- Iterated matched products of finite braces and simplicity; new solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation (2016, background): “But not all finite solvable groups are isomorphic to the multiplicative group of a left brace [2].”
- Solutions of the Yang–Baxter equation associated to skew left braces, with applications to racks (2016, methodology): “, and that many of the previous results are more naturally stated in terms of this structure. A good introduction to left braces can be found in [20]. This new approach turned out to be very fruitful [4, 3, 5, 6, 21, 18, 26, 38, 37]. In particular, in [5] a method was presented to construct, from a ”
- Skew left braces of nilpotent type (2018, methodology): “One easily proves by induction that A([1]) ⊇ A([2]) ⊇ · · · .”
- Bi-skew braces and Hopf Galois structures (2019, unknown): “Generalizing [13] for (B,+) a radical ring, Bachiller [3] proved that if m+2 ≤ p, then for every b in B, the order of b in (B, ◦) is equal to the order of b in (B,+).”