The importance of bank seniority for relationship lending

By S. Longhofer, João A. C. Santos. 2000

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6370b054fcb46712b7fb183e39ecf0df06b87dc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Relationship Banking: What Do We Know? (2000, background): “18 Longhofer and Santos (2000) develop an alternative explanation for seniority of bank debt.”
How Collateral Laws Shape Lending and Sectoral Activity (2016, unknown): “…(2001), Bester (1985), Chan and Thakor (1987), Berger and Udell (1990), Boot and Thakor (1994), Rajan and Winton (1995), Gorton and Kahn (2000), Longhofer and Santos (2000), John et al. (2003), Djankov et al. (2003), Benmelech et al. (2005), Jimenez et al. (2006), Gan (2007), Djankov et al.…”
Trade Credit, Risk Sharing, and Inventory Financing Portfolios (2017, unknown): “When the retailer does not have sufficient revenue to repay both claims fully, following common practice (Schwartz 1997, Longhofer and Santos 2000), we assume 3 Despite its widespread use, trade credit is not the only form of supplier financing.”
How Inventory Is (Should Be) Financed: Trade Credit in Supply Chains with Demand Uncertainty and Costs of Financial Distress (2013, unknown): “For related works, see Schwartz (1997), Mann (1997), Longhofer and Santos (2000), and references therein.”
The Ability of Banks to Lend to Informationally Opaque Small Businesses (2001, background): “4 reduced collateral requirements (Berger and Udell 1995, Harhoff and Körting 1998a, Scott and Dunkelberg 1999), greater debt seniority for the relationship lenders (Longhofer and Santos 2000), lower dependence on trade debt (Petersen and Rajan 1994, 1995), greater protection against the interest ra”