Gender analysis of a nationwide cropping system trial survey in Malawi
By R. Gilbert, W. D. Sakala, T. Benson. 2002
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6357d2843f8efc08c6791faddbf3bb8ae4281dc2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Nkonya
- Patricia Biermayr-Jenzano
- Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick
- V. Wilde
- M. Noordeloos
- N. Beintema
- A. Quisumbing
- John Pender
Citations in the corpus
- Engendering Agricultural Research, Development, and Extension (2012, background): “The percentage of farmers with access to contacts with or visits by agricultural extension agents or livestock officers is consistently lower for women than for men: for example, 19 percent for women versus 81 percent for men in Malawi (Gilbert et al. 2002) and less than 2 percent for female-headed”
- Gender and Agriculture : Inefficiencies, Segregation, and Low Productivity Traps (2013, unknown): “Gilbert, Sakala, and Benson (2002) document an extension and new technology trial in Malawi.”
- Understanding the Complexities Surrounding Gender Differences in Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria and Uganda (2011, background): “In an evaluation of a nation-wide cropping trial, Gilbert et al. (2002) in Malawi find no crop yield differences by gender of farmer once socio-economic and input differences are controlled for.”
- Engendering agricultural research (2010, background): “Access to extension agent visits Contact with or visit by agricultural extension agents or livestock officers is consistently lower for women as compared to men: for example, 19 percent for women versus 81 percent for men in Malawi (Gilbert et al. 2002) and less than 2 percent among female-headed ho”