Community based natural resource management in Zimbabwe: the experience of CAMPFIRE

By Russell D. Taylor. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2009

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63518dd9320047c8b4794ab9b811148742b4b7a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Trevor J. Willis
2. Nicholas Polunin
3. Nicholas A. J. Graham
4. Euan Harvey
5. R. Babcock
6. M. Pratchett
7. S. Jennings
8. S. Wilson

In Global and Planetary Change

1. K. Brown
2. Matthew W. Luizza
3. Trevor J. Willis
4. Tyler A. Beeton
5. C. Shackleton
6. K. Galvin
7. Nicholas Polunin
8. Nicholas A. J. Graham

In Sociology and Political Science

1. K. Brown
2. Matthew W. Luizza
3. Tyler A. Beeton
4. C. Shackleton
5. K. Galvin

Citations in the corpus

• African community-based conservation: a systematic review of social and ecological outcomes (2018, background): “A key assumption is that socioeconomic incentives for participation in CBC allow local populations to maintain biodiversity, increase their socioeconomic status, and support economic development more generally (Andersson and Ostrom 2008, Taylor 2009, Dougill et al. 2012, Mace 2014).”
• Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management (2010, background): “On the first, many case studies imply or claim benefits, but lack the data and information to verify those claims, with some noteworthy exceptions, such as Zimbabwe’s CAMPFIRE programme (Taylor 2009).”