Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: the status quo in Japan and the future prospects

By M. Saito, T. Marumoto. Plant and Soil, 2002

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Pharmacology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63467a76d7c011e60b967ac1de35eef4b3907745

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

1. A. Varma
2. J. Thies
3. J. Whipps
4. Hongyan Jin
5. R. Bardgett
6. Matthias C. Rillig

In Pharmacology

1. A. Varma
2. Z. Solaiman
3. J. Whipps
4. Hongyan Jin
5. Matthias C. Rillig

In Plant Science

1. Hongyan Jin
2. Matthias C. Rillig
3. R. Bardgett
4. A. Varma
5. N. Ostle
6. J. Thies
7. David E. Crowley
8. Z. Solaiman

Citations in the corpus

• Direct and residual effect of biochar application on mycorrhizal root colonisation, growth and nutrition of wheat (2010, background): “It has been claimed that biochar can influence microbial activity by providing a favourable microhabitat (pore space), due to its weak alkalinity and by being a substrate unfavourable for saprophytes (Saito and Marumoto 2002).”
• Biochar in bioenergy cropping systems: impacts on soil faunal communities and linked ecosystem processes (2013, background): “Initial research indicates that, in some situations, biochar can enhance mycorrhizal colonization and sporulation (Saito & Marumoto, 2002; Warnock et al., 2007); hence the use of biochar in bioenergy cropping sites could further amplify root-derived carbon transfer to the soil, potentially…”
• Characterization Of Microbial Life Colonizing Biochar And Biochar-Amended Soils (2010, background): “One study showed that biochar is able to serve as a habitat for extraradical fungal hyphae that sporulate in the microspores due to lower competition from saprophytes (Saito and Marumoto, 2002).”
• Mycorrhiza : state of the art, genetics and molecular biology, eco-function, biotechnology, eco-physiology, structure and systematics (2008, background): “Even though farmers understand the significance of sustainable agricultural systems, the reduction of P inputs by using AM fungal inocula alone cannot be justified except, perhaps, in the case of some highly specialised crops (Saito and Marumoto 2002).”
• Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions (2007, background): “…(Tryon 1948; Mikan and Abrams 1995; Lehmann et al. 2003a; Oguntunde et al. 2004); and (3) the bio-char enhances mycorrhizal infection, as it is able to serve as a habitat for extraradical hyphae that sporulate in its micropores due to lower competition from saprophytes (Saito and Marumoto 2002).”
• Biochar effects on soil biota – A review (2011, background): “Both bacteria and fungi are hypothesized to be better protected against grazers or competitors by exploring pore habitats in biochars (Ogawa, 1994; Ezawa et al., 2002; Saito and Marumoto, 2002; Thies and Rillig, 2009).”
• Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens (2004, background): “AM inocula are also applied similarly to help plants establish in degraded or bare landscapes or in polluted soils (Vosatka and Dodd 2002; Saito and Marumoto 2002).”