The Energy Technology Innovation System

By K. Gallagher, Arnulf Grubler, Laura Kuhl, Gregory F. Nemet, Charlie Wilson. 2012

272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/632d89b96c25661adbfd76f27c4bcac8fd9dcfe3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Charlie Wilson
2. Benjamin Sovacool
3. Gregory F. Nemet
4. S. Sorrell
5. Pete Smith
6. Gernot Wagner
7. Robert E Kopp
8. Jiacan Yuan

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Benjamin Sovacool
2. S. Sorrell
3. Sabine Fuss
4. J. Minx
5. W. Lamb
6. M. Callaghan
7. Tim Schwanen
8. Frank W. Geels

Citations in the corpus

• The political logics of clean energy transitions (2018, unknown): “34 Lester and Hart (2012); Gallagher et al. (2012).”
• Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, methodology): “Second, we selected key words and phrases from four comprehensive review articles on climate changerelated innovation (Weyant 2011, Anadon 2012, Gallagher et al 2012, Fri and Savitz 2014).”
• Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates (2018, background): “Innovation is viewed as a collective activity involving many actors and knowledge feedbacks and is strongly influenced by institutional settings [28].”
• Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany (2018, unknown): “In this paper, we take a first step in addressing this current shortcoming in mainstream innovation surveys by using the example of the decarbonization of the energy system, in which renewable energies play a key role (Gallagher et al., 2012; Jacobsson and Bergek, 2004; Negro et al., 2012).”
• The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level (2016, background): “…frequent iteration and feedback in order to be able to repeat process stages to undertake corrections, adjust to unforeseen developments and correct mistakes (Bruns et al., 2010; Fetterhoff and Voelkel, 2006; Gallagher et al. 2012; Hermans, 2011; Van der Duin et al., 2007; Veldkamp et al., 2009).”
• Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies (2012, background): “Local knowledge and institutions are needed to develop, manufacture (or import), adapt, install, and above all, use a new energy technology effectively (Grubler et al., 2012).”
• Tipping elements and climate–economic shocks: Pathways toward integrated assessment (2016, background): “Approaches like energy innovation systems [Gallagher et al., 2012] and socio-technical systems transitions [Geels, 2005; Geels and Schot, 2007] embed technology adoption within supply and demand dynamics, sources of technology change, the technology development cycle, innovation processes, and feedb”