The Aliens Have Landed! Reflections on the Rhetoric of Biological Invasions

By Banu Subramaniam. 2001

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Confronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia? (2003, background): “Subramaniam (2001) does not deny that introduced species have many harmful impacts, but she views nativism rather than the impacts as the key motivation of people concerned with them: . . . we are living in a cultural moment where the anxieties of globalization are feeding nationalisms through…”
The Rise and Fall of Biotic Nativeness: A Historical Perspective (2010, background): “Critiques have emerged from within and without examining invasion biology ’ s concepts and practices (for example Milton 2000 ; Subramaniam 2001 ; Sagoff 2002, 2005 ; Theodoropoulos 2003 ; Colautti & MacIsaac 2004 ; Brown & Sax 2005 ; Gobster 2005 ; Larson 2007 ; Warren 2007 ; Davis 2009 ;…”
An alien approach to invasive species: objectivity and society in invasion biology (2007, result): “Their proposal also overlaps in intriguing ways with recent cultural critiques of invasion biology (Subramaniam 2001; Theodoropoulos 2003; Sagoff 2005).”
THE EMERGENCE OF MULTISPECIES ETHNOGRAPHY (2010, background): “For innovative uses of animals to “think with,” see Haraway 1989 (see Strum and Fedigan 2000 for a response), Tsing 1995 (on bees and national identity), Maurer 2000 (on fish and money), and Subramaniam 2001 (on “invasive species” and xenophobia).”