Consumer-Grade Global Positioning System (GPS) Accuracy and Reliability
By Michael G. Wing, Aaron Eklund, L. Kellogg. 2005
372 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62f029f430037ae7d51fa0e2b1b0510b27c553e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Environmental Engineering
- Aharon Bar-Hillel
- Dan Levi
- M. Nelson
- Inakwu O. A. Odeh
- Thomas F. A. Bishop
- John Triantafilis
- Ronen Lerner
- Guy Raz
Citations in the corpus
- Positional Accuracy of Assisted GPS Data from High-Sensitivity GPS-enabled Mobile Phones (2011, background): “For example, Wing et al. (2005) tested six different consumer grade units and performance was found to vary considerably among units and was strongly influenced by canopy cover.”
- Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey (2014, background): “Current commercial GPS receivers typically achieve accuracy of 5− 10 meters [41], which can be improved to 1 meter using accurate IMU integration [24,22].”
- An error budget for different sources of error in digital soil mapping (2011, background): “Wing et al. (2005) showed that the positional error from consumer-grade GPS devices is between 5 and 10-m depending on the device and conditions of use.”
- Grizzly bear and human interaction in Yellowstone National Park: An evaluation of bear management areas (2013, methodology): “We assigned a buffer to all GPS locations within the remaining on-trail and off-trail hiking segments; buffers were equal to the mean distance a backcountry user traveled per minute, plus 1 standard deviation, plus 10 m to incorporate GPS error (Wing et al. 2005).”