Natural Pragmatics and Natural Codes
By T. Wharton. 2003
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62ec58505edb6886817c11b7c18706bf250ad4fe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- T. Wharton
- Deirdre Wilson
- Robyn Carston
- Dan Sperber
- Elly Ifantidou
- D. Blakemore
- Gerard Steen
- Ira A. Noveck
In Language and Linguistics
- T. Wharton
- Deirdre Wilson
- Robyn Carston
- Dan Sperber
- Elly Ifantidou
- D. Blakemore
- Gerard Steen
- Ira A. Noveck
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Relevance theory: A tutorial (2002, unknown): “has evolved a specialised sub-module dedicated to comprehension, with its own proprietary concepts and mechanisms (Sperber 1996, 2000, 2002, Origgi & Sperber 2000, Wilson 2000, Sperber & Wilson 2002). If we are right, the Communicative Principle of Relevance in (7) above (‘Every ostensive stimulus c”
- Relevance and prosody (2006, background): “In Section 4, we argue that both ‘natural’ and properly linguistic prosodic signals may achieve their effects by encoding procedural rather than conceptual information (Blakemore 1987, 2002; Fretheim 2002; Wharton 2003a).”