A breakthrough in women's bargaining power: the impact of microcredit
By Lutfun N. Khan Osmani. 2007
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62ddd6bae029230809b37f93cc66db3e69b1383e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Gender Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Economic Self-Help group Programs for Improving Women's Empowerment: A Systematic Review (2015, methodology): “…High risk of bias High risk of bias Medium risk of bias Nessa et al., 2012 High risk of bias High risk of bias High Risk of Bias Low risk of bias Osmani, 2007 High risk of bias High risk of bias High risk of bias Low risk of bias Pitt et al., 2006 Medium risk of bias High risk of bias Medium…”
- Can self-help group programs improve women’s empowerment? A systematic review (2017, background): “The majority of the included studies focused on South Asia (Ahmed 2005; Bali Swain and Wallentin 2009; Banerjee et al. 2015; De Hoop et al. 2014; Deininger and Liu 2013; Desai and Joshi 2012; Garikipati 2008; Garikipati 2012; Holvoet 2005; Husain, Mukherjee, and Dutta 2010; Mahmud 1994; Mukherjee an”
- Empowering Women through Microfinance: Evidence from Tanzania (2013, background): “Many evaluations of MFIs have shown that microfinance services have a positive impact on women (Hashemi et al., 1996; Khandker, 2005; Lakwo, 2006; Mahmud, 2003; MkNelly & Dunford, 1998, MkNelly & Dunford, 1999; Morduch, 1998; Osmani, 2007; Pitt & Khandker, 1998; Pitt et al., 2006; Pitt et al., 2003;”