On icosahedral Artin representations

By Kevin Buzzard, Mark Dickinson, N. Shepherd-barron, Richard Taylor. 2001

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

If ρ : Gal(Qac/Q) → GL2(C) is a continuous odd irreducible representation with nonsolvable image, then under certain local hypotheses we prove that ρ is the representation associated to a weight 1 modular form and hence that the L-function of ρ has an analytic continuation to the entire complex plane. Introduction E. Artin [A] conjectured that theL-seriesL(r, s) of any continuous representation r : Gal(Qac/Q) −→ GLn(C) is entire except possibly for a pole at s = 1 whenr contains the trivial representation. The case when n = 1 is simply a restatement of the Kronecker-Weber theorem and standard results on the analytic continuation of Dirichlet L-series. Artin proved his conjecture when r is induced from a 1-dimensional representation of an open subgroup of Gal (Qac/Q). Moreover, R. Brauer [ Br] was able to show in general that L(r, s) is meromorphic on the whole complex plane. Since then, the only real progress has been for n = 2, although very recently D. Ramakrishnan [Ra] has dealt with somen = 4 cases. Whenn = 2, such representations can be classified according to the image of the projectivised representation proj : Gal(Qac/Q) −→ PGL2(C). This image is either cyclic, dihedral, the alternating group A4 (the tetrahedral case), the symmetric group S4 (the octahedral case), or the alternating group A5 (the icosahedral case). When the image of projr is cyclic, thenr is reducible and Artin’s conjecture follows from the n = 1 case. When the image of proj is dihedral, thenr is induced from a character of an open subgroup of index 2, and so Artin himself proved the conjecture in this case, although the result is implicit in earlier work of E. Hecke [ H ]. R. Langlands [Langl] proved Artin’s conjecture for tetrahedral and some octahedral representations. J. Tunnell [Tu] extended this to all octahedral representations. These results are based on Langlands’s theory of cyclic base change for automorphic representations of GL 2, DUKE MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL Vol. 109, No. 2, c ©2001 Received 29 December 1999. Revision received 13 October 2000. 2000Mathematics Subject Classification . Primary 11F11, 11F80; Secondary 11F33, 11G18, 14G22. Taylor’s work partially supported by National Science Foundation grant number DMS-9702885 and by the Miller Institute at the University of California at Berkeley.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62cafea296f91b74665b4db6ce3c3667a91b50da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Frank Calegari
  2. Jean-Pierre Wintenberger
  3. Barry Mazur
  4. Chandrashekhar B. Khare
  5. M. Kisin
  6. F. Andreatta
  7. V. Pilloni
  8. T. Gee

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Frank Calegari
  2. Jean-Pierre Wintenberger
  3. Barry Mazur
  4. Chandrashekhar B. Khare
  5. M. Kisin
  6. F. Andreatta
  7. V. Pilloni
  8. T. Gee

Citations in the corpus