Methodologies of misgendering: Recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research

By Y. G. Ansara, Peter V. Hegarty. 2014

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62c640eb12da79724e7f8542524f47f3c739a7a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

The Misgendering Machines (2018, background): “and is a common daily experience of trans people [6].”
Evaluating inclusive gender identity measures for use in quantitative psychological research (2018, methodology): “This is somewhat puzzling, given that this option is recommended by a number of researchers (e.g. Ansara & Hegarty, 2014; Rankin & Garvey, 2015) and has proven popular among transgender participants in studies that offer it (Harrison-Quintana et al., 2015).”
Transgender youth homelessness: Understanding programmatic barriers through the lens of cisgenderism (2015, background): “…avoiding the binary categorization of people as ‘transgender’ and ‘cisgender’ due to the inherent implication that transgender people and cisgender people are distinctly different beings and the potential for this implication to obstruct a focus on systemic oppression (Ansara & Hegarty, 2014).”
A Minority Stress Perspective on Transgender Individuals’ Experiences With Misgendering (2016, background): “The present article adds to this emergent body of research by utilizing a minority stress perspective to investigate transgender individuals’ experiences with misgendering—the misclassification of gender identity (Ansara & Hegarty, 2014; McLemore, 2015).”
Family support and discrimination and their relationship to psychological distress and resilience amongst transgender people (2018, background): “The contentious nature of such relationships can be broadly understood through the lens of cisgenderism: the ideology that delegitimizes peoples’ understandings of their bodies and genders (Ansara, 2010, 2015; Ansara & Hegarty, 2014; Blumer, Ansara & Watson, 2013; Riggs, Ansara & Treharne, 2015).”
Hetero-cis–normativity and the gendering of transphobia (2016, background): “Furthermore, the continued critique of binaristic conceptualizations of gender, especially the cisgender/transgender binary, is essential (Ansara, 2010, 2012; Ansara & Hegarty, 2012, 2013, 2014).”
What is gender, anyway: a review of the options for operationalising gender (2020, methodology): “…third option might be grounded in an underlying assumption that transgender and cisgender are distinctly different from each other (a problem discussed by e.g. Ansara & Hegarty, 2014), and that transgender identities constitutes a homogenous group (Beauregard, Arevshatian, Booth, & Whittle, 2016).”