Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added

By Robert C. Johnson, Guillermo Noguera. 2012

1,803 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62b5c1904134bc1b6939bc9ec809531e6822a0da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Networks of Value Added Trade (2017, neutral): “The initial contributions were those of Daudin et al. (2011), Johnson and Noguera (2012) and Koopman et al. (2014).”
Domestic Value Added in Exports: Theory and Firm Evidence from China (2015, positive): “To estimate αID, we estimate the following econometric counterpart of (14) :”
The Relationship Between Global Value Chains and Productivity (2017, background): “5 See for example, Johnson and Noguera, 2012, Koopman et al., 2014, which build on the vertical special- ization measures of Hummels et al., 2001.”
Networks, Barriers, and Trade (2019, positive): “In explicitly accounting for the existence of intermediate inputs, our approach also speaks to how one can circumvent the double-counting problem and spill-overs arising from differences in gross and value-added trade, issues studied by Johnson and Noguera (2012) and Koopman et al. (2014).”
Trade-in-goods and trade-in-tasks: An Integrating Framework (2010, neutral): “Jones and Kierzkowski (1990), for 1 See Jones and Marjit (1992), Arndt (1997, 1999), Jones and Findlay (2000, 2001), Jones and Kierzkowski (1998, 2000), Jones, Kierzkowski and Leonard (2002), and Francois (1990a, b, c). instance, argue that workers whose jobs are “lost” to offshoring may, somewhat p”
Openness and income: The roles of trade and migration (2014, background): “34 Recent studies such as Bems et al. (2010) and Johnson and Noguera (2012) have emphasized that with the increasing fragmentation of production across countries, (gross) trade flowsmay bemuch larger than the value added content of trade, especially for those countries doing a lot of processing…”
The mismatch between local voting and the local economic consequences of Brexit (2017, methodology): “Finally, the multiregional input-output table is generated from the interregional supply and use tables.3 Our analysis is inspired by the trade in value added approach pioneered in Johnson and Noguera (2012).”
The Globalisation of Inflation: The Growing Importance of Global Value Chains (2017, positive): “Now, the data from Johnson and Noguera (2016) allow us to split trade in intermediate goods and services from the conventional measure of trade openness (CMTO):”
The Continental Divide? Economic Exposure to Brexit in Regions and Countries on Both Sides of The Channel (2018, methodology): “If one is not so much interested in the specific channels through which GDP in region r depends on final demand in region or country s, the approach pioneered in an intercountry context by Johnson and Noguera (2012) can be used. In order to contrast this approach with the perspective that we adopt i”
Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century (2021, methodology): “To compare the value added from international trade over time we use TiVA (Johnson and Noguera, 2012; Timmer et al., 2014) in constant international 2010 US-American dollars (USD).”
Demand Spillovers and the Collapse of Trade in the Global Recession (2010, methodology): “As discussed in the introduction, we do so by combining national input-output tables with bilateral trade data as in Johnson and Noguera (2009).”