The number of extensions of a number field with fixed degree and bounded discriminant
By Jordan S. Ellenberg, Akshay Venkatesh. 2003
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We give an upper bound on the number of extensions of a fixed number field of prescribed degree and discriminant ≤ X; these bounds improve on work of Schmidt. We also prove various related results, such as lower bounds for the number of extensions and upper bounds for Galois extensions.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62b25ecf13d1d7af61f6320f70a7ede5727f45a4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
- Kiran S. Kedlaya
- Manjul Bhargava
- A. Shankar
- Jordan S. Ellenberg
- Akshay Venkatesh
- Xiaoheng Wang
- Melanie Matchett Wood
- B. Gross
In Geometry and Topology
- Manjul Bhargava
- Jordan S. Ellenberg
- Kiran S. Kedlaya
- Akshay Venkatesh
- A. Shankar
- Xiaoheng Wang
- Melanie Matchett Wood
- L. Pierce
In Mathematical Physics
- Kiran S. Kedlaya
- A. Shankar
- Manjul Bhargava
- Akshay Venkatesh
- Jordan S. Ellenberg
- Xiaoheng Wang
- Melanie Matchett Wood
- Peter Scholze
Citations in the corpus
- Counting primitive points of bounded height (2010, unknown): “The latter is proved only for very special cases although great progress was achieved by the recent work of Ellenberg and Venkatesh [4].”
- Counting extensions of function fields with bounded discriminant and specified Galois group (2005, methodology): “Counting extensions of function fields with bounded discriminant and specified Galois group Jordan S. Ellenberg and Akshay Venkatesh∗ 29 Apr 2004”
- A construction of polynomials with squarefree discriminants (2011, methodology): “This is far inferior to what can be shown using other methods: for n ≤ 5 the number of such fields is known to be O(N) by work of Bhargava [2, 3], while for larger n, Ellenberg and Venkatesh [5] have given a lower bound of cN 2 .”
- Squarefree values of polynomial discriminants I (2016, background): “Following [9], for any algebraic number x, we write ‖x‖ for the maximum of the archimedean absolute values of x.”