Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU

By T. L. T. Nguyen, J. Hermansen, L. Mogensen. 2010

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62b19368beee6cacaa17929c390732aa5cbf3cdd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Reinout Heijungs
2. A. Zamagni
3. A. Raggi
4. Paolo Masoni
5. T. Garnett
6. Mateusz Lewandowski
7. John Ehrenfeld
8. Arnold Tukker

In Environmental Engineering

1. Jeroen B. Guinée
2. Reinout Heijungs
3. A. Zamagni
4. Paolo Masoni
5. A. Raggi
6. Nathan Pelletier
7. T. Garnett
8. Mateusz Lewandowski

In Pollution

1. Reinout Heijungs

Citations in the corpus

• Energy Intensity of Agriculture and Food Systems (2011, background): “(64) investigated opportunities for reducing energy use in pig farming in the EU, reporting that using manure to produce methane can potentially offset 57% of supply chain energy use.”
• An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain (2014, background): “The Future of Food and Farming, 2011; Nguyen et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2006).”
• Lights and shadows in consequential LCA (2012, methodology): “CLCA has been applied to a wide range of products (e.g. Astrup and Fruergaard 2011; Geyer 2008; Kimming et al. 2011a, 2011b; Nguyen et al. 2010; Schmidt et al. 2007; Thrane 2006), and also outside LCA, with the introduction of the concept of consequential social life cycle assessment(2) (Jörgensen e”