Network Representation Learning: A Survey

By Daokun Zhang, Jie Yin, Xingquan Zhu, Chengqi Zhang. 2017

693 citations recorded by the source corpus.

With the widespread use of information technologies, information networks are becoming increasingly popular to capture complex relationships across various disciplines, such as social networks, citation networks, telecommunication networks, and biological networks. Analyzing these networks sheds light on different aspects of social life such as the structure of societies, information diffusion, and communication patterns. In reality, however, the large scale of information networks often makes network analytic tasks computationally expensive or intractable. Network representation learning has been recently proposed as a new learning paradigm to embed network vertices into a low-dimensional vector space, by preserving network topology structure, vertex content, and other side information. This facilitates the original network to be easily handled in the new vector space for further analysis. In this survey, we perform a comprehensive review of the current literature on network representation learning in the data mining and machine learning field. We propose new taxonomies to categorize and summarize the state-of-the-art network representation learning techniques according to the underlying learning mechanisms, the network information intended to preserve, as well as the algorithmic designs and methodologies. We summarize evaluation protocols used for validating network representation learning including published benchmark datasets, evaluation methods, and open source algorithms. We also perform empirical studies to compare the performance of representative algorithms on common datasets, and analyze their computational complexity. Finally, we suggest promising research directions to facilitate future study.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Shirui Pan
  2. Chengqi Zhang
  3. Guodong Long
  4. Jing Jiang
  5. Jiashi Feng
  6. Jiliang Tang
  7. Bryan Perozzi
  8. Ruiqi Hu

In Molecular Biology

  1. Shirui Pan
  2. Chengqi Zhang
  3. Guodong Long
  4. Jing Jiang
  5. Ruiqi Hu
  6. Peter Forsyth
  7. Zhewei Wei
  8. Sami Abu-El-Haija

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Shirui Pan
  2. Chengqi Zhang
  3. Bryan Perozzi
  4. Guodong Long
  5. Ruiqi Hu
  6. Jing Jiang
  7. Xingquan Zhu
  8. Jiliang Tang

Citations in the corpus