Game Theory in Wireless Networks: A Tutorial
By Márk Félegyházi, Jean-Pierre Hubaux. 2006
339 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/629536e8cdf4b4a3111a00a23da6012916be3a72
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jeffrey G. Andrews
- Steven Weber
- Seyed Mehran Dibaji
- Nihar Jindal
- Mohammad Pirani
- David Bezalel Flamholz
- Anuradha M. Annaswamy
- Aranya Chakrabortty
Citations in the corpus
- A systems and control perspective of CPS security (2019, background): “On the other hand, in the case where the defending user behaves actively or either side has an information advantage, the Nash equilibrium becomes a reasonable solution concept [121], [122].”
- Security and Cooperation in Wireless Networks (2007, methodology): “This appendix is derived from a technical report by Felegyhazi and Hubaux [134].”
- The Effect of Fading, Channel Inversion, and Threshold Scheduling on Ad Hoc Networks (2007, background): “Much of this work is game theoretic in that transmission decisions of neighboring transmitters are coupled: an active neighboring interferer reduces the SIR seen by a receiver, which makes it less likely for that receiver’s transmitter to transmit [27].”