Gender and erotic plasticity: sociocultural influences on the sex drive

By Roy F. Baumeister. 2004

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/628f7a4ca6195d6edcfa3752b0a78e9f23d4d2c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Wilt
2. Shane W. Kraus
3. A. Braden
4. Joshua B. Grubbs
5. D. Sanchez
6. Paul J. Wright
7. A. Kiefer

In Gender Studies

1. Shane W. Kraus
2. A. Braden
3. J. Wilt
4. Joshua B. Grubbs
5. D. Sanchez
6. Paul J. Wright
7. A. Kiefer

In Social Psychology

1. D. Sanchez
2. Paul J. Wright
3. A. Kiefer

Citations in the corpus

• Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective (2007, background): “Baumeister (2000, 2004), for example, has argued that women’s sexual behavior and experiences are more influenced by social and contextual forces than are men’s, implying that sexual passivity should be linked to women’s, but not men’s, sexual satisfaction.”
• Internet pornography use and sexual motivation: a systematic review and integration (2019, background): “…a function of multiple factors such as a grander cultural trend in which women’s sexual motivation is often secondary to the male sexual drive (Baumeister, 2000, 2004; Baumeister & Twenge, 2002; Baumeister & Vohs, 2004; Baumeister, Catanese, & Vohs, 2001), more universal differences in male…”