Large language models and the perils of their hallucinations
By Razvan Azamfirei, S. Kudchadkar, J. Fackler. Critical Care, 2023
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/628d23e976ffc7f65dab68ffc5b47da0cb6978ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- A study of generative large language model for medical research and healthcare (2023, unknown): “…facilitate documentation of patient reports (e.g., a progress report) 3,4 , improving diagnostic accuracy 5 , and assisting in various clinical care 6,7 , while at the same time concerning the hallucinations and fabrications 7,8 , bias and stereotype 9 , and risks of patient privacy and ethics 10 .”
- Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools (2023, background): “The most notable of these, that have also been discussed in recent publications 105–108 regarding the applications of LLMs, are hallucination, difficulty of evaluating results, and reproducibility.”
- Communicative Agents for Software Development (2023, methodology): “Similar to hallucinations encountered when using LLMs for natural language querying [2], directly generating entire software systems using LLMs can result in severe code hallucinations, such as incomplete implementation, missing dependencies, and undiscovered bugs.”