Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression ramp (2007, background): “Knight et al. [9] compiled a summary of existing LES for the compression ramp configuration and concluded that LES did not predict the wall pressure or the separation length accurately in separated flows.”
Direct numerical simulation of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation (2010, background): “Despite these encouraging results, efforts are still needed to improve turbulence models, especially for predicting the rapid rise and subsequent decay of turbulence in the separated shear layer developing past the interacting shock (Knight et al. 2003; Sandham, Yao & Lawal 2003).”
High order one-step monotonicity-preserving schemes for unsteady compressible flow calculations (2004, background): “At the present time, it is commonly admitted that large Eddy simulation (LES) is a highly promising technique for the prediction of complex shock wave turbulence interactions including large-scale flow phenomena such as those encountered in engineering applications [8, 12 ].”
Large-eddy simulation of shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction (2006, methodology): “However, as pointed out by Knight et al. (2003) and Zheltovodov (2004), even LES predictions need to be interpreted with care.”