Organic carbon dynamics in mangrove ecosystems : a review

By E. Kristensen, S. Bouillon, T. Dittmar, C. Marchand. 2008

1,343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Our current knowledge on production, composition, transport, pathways and transformations of organic carbon in tropical mangrove environments is reviewed and discussed. Organic carbon entering mangrove foodwebs is either produced autochthonously or imported by tides and/or rivers. Mangrove litter and benthic microalgae are usually the most important autochthonous carbon sources. Depending on local conditions, phytoplankton and seagrass detritus imported with tides may represent a significant supplementary carbon input. Litter handling by the fauna not only affects microbial carbon transformations, but also the amount of organic carbon available for export. Most mangrove detritus that enters the sediment is degraded by microorganisms. Aerobic respiration and anaerobic sulfate reduction are usually considered the most important microbial respiration processes, but recent evidence suggests that iron respiration may be important in mangrove sediments as well. Organic carbon that escapes microbial degradation is stored in sediments and in some mangrove ecosystems, organic-rich sediments may extend to several meters depth. Many mangrove forests also lose a significant fraction of their net primary production to coastal waters. Large differences occur between mangrove forests with respect to litter production and export. Mangrove-derived DOC is also released into the water column and can add to the total organic carbon export. Numerous compounds have been characterized from mangrove tissues, including carbohydrates, amino acids, lignin-derived phenols, tannins, fatty acids, triterpenoids and n-alkanes. Many of these may, together with stable isotopes, exhibit a strong source signature and are potentially useful tracers of mangrove-derived organic matter. Our knowledge on mangrove carbon dynamics has improved considerably in recent years, but there are still significant gaps and shortcomings. These are emphasized and relevant research directions are suggested.

Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/627c5ae828fd6a099bf6741204571940b42ac2f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Jeffrey Chow
  2. Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
  3. J. Kairo
  4. Nico Koedam
  5. J. Bosire
  6. Ludwig Triest
  7. Shing Yip Lee
  8. E. Kristensen

In Oceanography

  1. Jeffrey Chow
  2. Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
  3. Shing Yip Lee
  4. Nico Koedam
  5. S. Bouillon
  6. E. Kristensen
  7. V. Rivera‐Monroy
  8. Robert R. Twilley

In Plant Science

  1. Jeffrey Chow
  2. J. Offenberg
  3. Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
  4. Nico Koedam
  5. E. Kristensen

Citations in the corpus