Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High‐Income OECD Countries

401 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

THE SUBSIDIARIZATION OF SOCIAL POLICIES: ACTORS, PROCESSES AND IMPACTS (2008, background): “Both these trends implied a reduction of the existing differences of the degree of financial decentralization5 (see Table 1) (Thieben 2003).”
Are Fiscal Adjustments Less Successful in Decentralized Governments? (2009, neutral): “Though there is a lot of evidence that fiscal decentralization matters for the size of government (for a survey see Feld, Kirchgässner and Schaltegger, 2004), for economic performance (Thiessen, 2003), or for fiscal discipline (Rodden, 2002), there is no empirical evidence on the effect of decentral”
The Rise of the “City-region” Concept and its Development Policy Implications (2008, background): “35; Thiesen, 2003 ) and for a more efficient allocation and delivery of policies, public goods, and services (Ebel & Yilmaz, 2002).”
Fiscal decentralization, macrostability and growth (2005, background): “(2) See, for example, Xie, Zou, and Davoodi (1999), Zhang and Zou (1998), Lin and Liu (2000), and Thiessen (2003) for empirical analyses of the relationship between between fiscal decentralization and economic growth.”
Public Sector Decentralization: Measurement Concepts and Recent International Trends (2005, neutral): “5See, e.g., Davoodi and Zou (1998), Thiessen (2003), or Behnisch et al. (2002).”