Relative potency in nonsimilar dose–response curves
By Christian Ritz, N. Cedergreen, J. E. Jensen, Jens Carl Streibig. Weed science, 2006
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/626d8279f2c7b660a4da54dc4d05a48f270eae78
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Plant Science
- J. Norsworthy
- Anders P. Schou
- N. Burgos
- Christian Ritz
- Jesper Rasmussen
- Bo Martin Bibby
- Vince M. Davis
- Jens Carl Streibig
In Pollution
- Christian Ritz
- Jens Carl Streibig
- P. Tranel
- J. Norsworthy
- D. Shaner
- N. Burgos
- Vince M. Davis
- Stephen Powles
Citations in the corpus
- Dose-Response Analysis Using R (2015, unknown): “More often it will change with the value of α 1 = α 2 and this may be investigated using the function relpot() [49].”
- Toward a unified approach to dose–response modeling in ecotoxicology (2010, background): “reproduced, and transformed in whatever way that is biologically meaningful in a given context, such as relative potencies used for comparisons of toxicity [58,59].”
- Investigating the selectivity of weed harrowing with new methods (2008, methodology): “The proposed procedure has similarities to the dose-response concept used to assess herbicidal selectivity (Streibig, 1988; Ritz et al., 2006) but also important dissimilarities.”
- Review: Confirmation of Resistance to Herbicides and Evaluation of Resistance Levels (2013, background): “In Figure 1B, R/S is more ambiguous because the curves have slightly different shapes; consequently R/S is only defined at the response level (here GR50) under which it is estimated (Ritz et al. 2006; Ritz 2010).”