Joint galaxy - lensing observables and the dark energy
196 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Deep multicolor galaxy surveys with photometric redshifts will provide a large number of two-point correlation observables: galaxy-galaxy angular correlations, galaxy-shear cross correlations, and shear-shear correlations between all redshifts. These observables can potentially enable a joint determination of the dark-energy-dependent evolution of the dark matter and distances as well as the relationship between galaxies and dark matter halos. With recent cosmic microwave background determinations of the initial power spectrum, a measurement of the mass clustering at even a single redshift will constrain a well-specified combination of dark energy (DE) parameters in a flat universe; we provide convenient fitting formulas for such studies. The combination of galaxy-shear and galaxy-galaxy correlations can determine this amplitude at multiple redshifts. We illustrate this ability in a description of the galaxy clustering with 5 free functions of redshift which can be fitted from the data. The galaxy modeling is based on a mapping onto halos of the same abundance that models a flux-limited selection. In this context and under a flat geometry, a 4000 deg${}^{2}$ galaxy-lensing survey can achieve a statistical precision of $\ensuremath{\sigma}({\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\mathrm{DE}})=0.005$ for the dark energy density, $\ensuremath{\sigma}{(w}_{\mathrm{DE}})=0.02$ and $\ensuremath{\sigma}{(w}_{a})=0.17$ for its equation of state and evolution, evaluated at dark energy matter equality $z\ensuremath{\approx}0.4,$ as well as constraints on the 5 halo functions out to $z=1.$ More importantly, a joint analysis can make dark energy constraints robust against systematic errors in the shear-shear correlation and halo modeling.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/625a4bcac64693f3098c0ab709c471078521d272
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- D. Schneider
- Daniel J. Eisenstein
- Rachel Mandelbaum
- Will J. Percival
- J. Brinkmann
- Simon D. M. White
- P. Hopkins
- D. Weinberg
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Lavinia Heisenberg
- D. Schneider
- Daniel J. Eisenstein
- Will J. Percival
- Yun Wang
- Shuang Wang
- Yi Wang
- S. Tsujikawa
Citations in the corpus
- Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements (2007, methodology): “This could come from better numerical simulations or from observations of the galaxy-shear and galaxy-galaxy cross correlation functions such as those by Mandelbaum et al. (2006); Hirata et al. (2007) or as suggested by Hu and Jain (2004).”
- Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample (2010, unknown): “…densityshape cross-correlations, we proceed in exact analogy and compute the three-dimensional correlation functionξphotgg (r̄p, Π̄, z̄m) from (e.g. Hu & Jain 2004) ξ ang gg (θ; z̄1, z̄2) = ∫ ∞ 0 dℓ ℓ 2π J0 (ℓθ) Cgg (ℓ; z̄1, z̄2) , (10) again by means of (A.11), where the angular power…”
- Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with future galaxy surveys (2011, methodology): “(20) yields (Hu & Jain 2004; Amara & Refregier 2007) F αβ = fsky lmax∑ l=lmin (2l + 1) 2 Tr [ D lα ( C̃ l )−1 D lβ ( C̃ l )−1] , (30) where fsky is the sky coverage of the survey.”
- LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2008, background): “The joint analysis of LSST weak lensing and BAO is particularly powerful in constraining the dynamical behavior of dark energy, i.e., how it evolves with cosmic time or redshift (Hu & Jain 2004; Zhan 2006).”
- Observational probes of cosmic acceleration (2012, methodology): “This formula, similar to that in Hu and Jain (2004), is found by varying the parameters in CAMB calculations around the WMAP7 mean values one at a time to evaluate logarithmic derivatives; spot checks indicate that it is accurate to 0.2% over the 2σ range of the WMAP7 errors, and for the range of w…”
- COSMOLIKE - cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys (2016, methodology): “In this section, we summarize the computation of angular (cross) power spectra for the different probes; a more detailed derivation can be found in Hu & Jain (2004).”
- Cosmological parameter constraints from SDSS luminous red galaxies: a new treatment of large-scale clustering (2009, background): “The pivot scale factor ap is defined as the point where equation (24) is minimized (Huterer & Turner 2001; Hu & Jain 2004; Albretch et al. 2006), that is ap = 1 + 〈δw0δwa〉〈 δw2a 〉 .”
- Optimal Surveys for Weak Lensing Tomography (2006, methodology): “The Fisher matrix for the shear power spectrum tomography is given by (Hu and Jain 2004) Fαβ = fsky ∑ l (2l + 1)∆l 2 Tr[DlαC̃ −1 l DlβC̃ −1 l ], (2) where the sum is over bands of multipole l of width ∆l, Tr stands for the trace, and fsky is the fraction of sky covered by the survey.”
- Evidence of the accelerated expansion of the Universe from weak lensing tomography with COSMOS (2009, methodology): “…measured as a function of source redshift, an analysis often called weak lensing tomography or 3D weak lensing (e.g. Hu 1999, 2002; Huterer 2002; Jain & Taylor 2003; Heavens 2003; Hu & Jain 2004; Bernstein & Jain 2004; Simon et al. 2004; Takada & Jain 2004; Heavens et al. 2006; Taylor et al. 2007).”
- CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT III: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS (2008, methodology): “A useful accurate tting formula can also 10 VIKHLININ ET AL. be found in Hu & Jain (2004): ∆̃R ≈ σ8 1.79 × 104 ( Ωbh2 0.024 ) 1/3 (ΩMh 2 0.14 ) −0.563 × (7.808 h)(1−n)/2 ( h 0.72 ) −0.693 0.76 G0 (3) (we adjusted numerical coe cients to take into account that the Hu & Jain approximation uses the…”
- DESI and other Dark Energy experiments in the era of neutrino mass measurements (2013, background): “For weak lensing, the weight function is [122]:”
- Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite (2012, background): “Explicit expressions for the Fisher matrix for cosmological observables can be found in [1155] for cosmic microwave background data, in [1151] for the matter power spectrum from galaxy redshift surveys (applied to baryonic acoustic oscillations in [1075] and in [610] for weak lensing.”