Joint galaxy - lensing observables and the dark energy

By Wayne Hu, B. Jain. 2003

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Deep multicolor galaxy surveys with photometric redshifts will provide a large number of two-point correlation observables: galaxy-galaxy angular correlations, galaxy-shear cross correlations, and shear-shear correlations between all redshifts. These observables can potentially enable a joint determination of the dark-energy-dependent evolution of the dark matter and distances as well as the relationship between galaxies and dark matter halos. With recent cosmic microwave background determinations of the initial power spectrum, a measurement of the mass clustering at even a single redshift will constrain a well-specified combination of dark energy (DE) parameters in a flat universe; we provide convenient fitting formulas for such studies. The combination of galaxy-shear and galaxy-galaxy correlations can determine this amplitude at multiple redshifts. We illustrate this ability in a description of the galaxy clustering with 5 free functions of redshift which can be fitted from the data. The galaxy modeling is based on a mapping onto halos of the same abundance that models a flux-limited selection. In this context and under a flat geometry, a 4000 deg${}^{2}$ galaxy-lensing survey can achieve a statistical precision of $\ensuremath{\sigma}({\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\mathrm{DE}})=0.005$ for the dark energy density, $\ensuremath{\sigma}{(w}_{\mathrm{DE}})=0.02$ and $\ensuremath{\sigma}{(w}_{a})=0.17$ for its equation of state and evolution, evaluated at dark energy matter equality $z\ensuremath{\approx}0.4,$ as well as constraints on the 5 halo functions out to $z=1.$ More importantly, a joint analysis can make dark energy constraints robust against systematic errors in the shear-shear correlation and halo modeling.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/625a4bcac64693f3098c0ab709c471078521d272

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  3. Rachel Mandelbaum
  4. Will J. Percival
  5. J. Brinkmann
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. D. Weinberg

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Lavinia Heisenberg
  2. D. Schneider
  3. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  4. Will J. Percival
  5. Yun Wang
  6. Shuang Wang
  7. Yi Wang
  8. S. Tsujikawa

Citations in the corpus