Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study.

By R. Erbel, S. Möhlenkamp, S. Moebus, A. Schmermund, N. Lehmann, A. Stang, N. Dragano, D. Grönemeyer, R. Seibel, H. Kälsch and 4 more. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010

785 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/624795a4fbed24e13214ae2bc2fcbd0bce3d58fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Qiong Lin
2. W. Wagner
3. Martin Zenke
4. Thomas W. Mühleisen
5. T. Naqvi
6. P. Ziegler
7. C. Koch
8. L. Eisele

Citations in the corpus

• Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. (2014, background): “6% at CAC cutoff points of 100 and 400, respectively (86).”
• Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites (2014, methodology): “Some 52 male and 53 female donors from different age categories (intervals of 6 years per age category) were selected randomly from the HNR study (4,814 participants) [56].”