Explanation Oriented Retrieval

By Dónal Doyle, Padraig Cunningham, Derek G. Bridge, Y. Rahman. 2004

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

Citations in the corpus

The Twin-System Approach as One Generic Solution for XAI: An Overview of ANN-CBR Twins for Explaining Deep Learning (2019, background): “The historical work on twin systems divides into a late-1990s collection of papers by a Korean group at KAIST (e.g., [Park et al., 2004]) and some mid-2000s work by an Irish CBR group (e.g., [Cunningham et al., 2003; Nugent and Cunningham, 2005; Doyle et al., 2004]).”
A Case-Based Explanation System for Black-Box Systems (2005, background): “Doyle et al.[8] have focused on the observation that the nearest retrieved case in a CBR system may not be the best case to present as an explanation.”
How Case-Based Reasoning Explains Neural Networks: A Theoretical Analysis of XAI Using Post-Hoc Explanation-by-Example from a Survey of ANN-CBR Twin-Systems (2019, background): “The next major step in the development of the twinning idea came in the mid-2000s, from a group of Irish researchers, largely, at University College Dublin [73-77].”
Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning (2005, unknown): “1984; Ashley & Aleven, 1992; Leake, 1996b; McSherry, 2001b; Cunningham et al ., 2003; Doyle et al ., 2004; McSherry, 2004b; Leake & McSherry, 2005).”
On the Use of Opinionated Explanations to Rank and Justify Recommendations (2016, methodology): “…have been used to support intelligent reasoning systems for some time; for instance, there are examples based on heuristics (Buchanan and Shortliffe 1984), case-based reasoning (Sørmo, Cassens, and Aamodt 2005; McSherry 2004; Doyle et al. 2004), and model-based techniques (Druzdzel 1996).”
Explanation in Case-Based Reasoning–Perspectives and Goals (2005, background): “Doyle et al. (2004) point out that the most similar case is not necessarily the most convincing case.”
Introduction to the Special Issue on Explanation in Case-Based Reasoning (2005, background): “CBR researchers have recently questioned the effectiveness of precedent-based explanations in which the user is simply shown one or more of the most similar cases (Doyle et al., 2004; Maximini et al., 2004; McSherry 2004; Roth-Berghofer 2004).”