A review of lunar chronology revealing a preponderance of 4.34–4.37 Ga ages

By L. Borg, A. Gaffney, C. Shearer. 2015

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/623c797271a928ed0192ffb0ccf83f6237206ee4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. D. Nesvorný
2. A. Morbidelli
3. Seth Andrew Jacobson
4. Mark A. Wieczorek
5. Simone Marchi
6. L. Elkins‐Tanton
7. D. Rubie
8. Steve Jacobson

In Geophysics

1. A. Morbidelli
2. L. Elkins‐Tanton
3. D. Rubie
4. Mark A. Wieczorek
5. Steve Jacobson
6. Simone Marchi
7. Seth Andrew Jacobson
8. D. Nesvorný

Citations in the corpus

• The timeline of the lunar bombardment: Revisited (2018, background): “…and Lugmair, 1988; Borg et al., 1999; 2011; Boyet et al., 2015 ), KREEP ( Carlson and Lugmair, 1979; Nyquist and Shih, 1992; Taylor et al., 2009; Borg et al., 2015; Snape et al., 2016 ), and Mg suite ages ( Boyet and Carlson, 2007; Gaffney and Borg, 2014; Barboni et al., 2016 ) indicate a long…”