Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

By M. Doughty, M. L. Zaman. Survey of ophthalmology, 2000

1,492 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: Quantitative analysis (2005, background): “5 mm Hg correction for eyes with chronic disease such as primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal-tension glaucoma.(16)”
Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer (2005, background): “a greater understanding of refractive surgery outcomes and the results of nonablative refractive correction such as conductive keratoplasty (CK), determining other potential factors in ectasia, and measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement interference.(1) This study explores the use of the R”
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. (2002, methodology): “We did not use available formulas to correct the IOP for corneal thickness because they are theoretical in nature(52) or derived from small samples with limited racial variation.(53-55) In the OHTS, the mean central corneal thickness among African Americans was 23.”