Catastrophic Forgetting Meets Negative Transfer: Batch Spectral Shrinkage for Safe Transfer Learning
By Xinyang Chen, Sinan Wang, Bo Fu, Mingsheng Long, Jianmin Wang. 2019
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Meta & Continual Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Meta & Continual Learning
Citations in the corpus
- Uni-Perceiver: Pre-training Unified Architecture for Generic Perception for Zero-shot and Few-shot Tasks (2021, background): “On the other hand, when fine-tuning is performed with insufficient training data, it may forget the pre-trained knowledge that is beneficial to the downstream task, thereby hurting generalization performance [14].”
- AFEC: Active Forgetting of Negative Transfer in Continual Learning (2021, neutral): “[3] developed a method to mitigate negative transfer when fine-tuning tasks on a pretrained network.”
- Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Language Models: When and Why Does It Work? (2020, background): “Thus, a future direction for potential improvement for intermediate-task training may be integrating the MLM objective into intermediate-task training or bounding network parameter changes to reduce catastrophic forgetting (Kirkpatrick et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2019).”
- A Review of Deep Transfer Learning and Recent Advancements (2022, methodology): “The primary issue in this approach is known as catastrophic forgetting dilemma since the obtained knowledge can be partially or totally wiped out [3, 4], making it a foremost necessity for this method to use similar source and target data.”
- MeLL: Large-scale Extensible User Intent Classification for Dialogue Systems with Meta Lifelong Learning (2021, methodology): “Typical methods include experience replay [16, 20, 40], knowledge distillation [6, 26], transfer learning [5, 19, 39], etc.”
- Recall and Learn: Fine-tuning Deep Pretrained Language Models with Less Forgetting (2020, background): “…et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019; Lan et al., 2020), previous works explore many finetuning tricks to reduce catastrophic forgetting for adaptation of the deep pretrained LMs (Howard and Ruder, 2018; Sun et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2020).”
- Feature Transformation Ensemble Model with Batch Spectral Regularization for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Classification (2020, background): “Previous work [2] shows that penalizing smaller singular values of a feature matrix can help mitigate negative transfer in fine-tuning.”
- Zoo-Tuning: Adaptive Transfer from a Zoo of Models (2021, background): “However, most of the existing fine-tuning approaches only transfer from a single pretrained deep network to the target task (Xuhong et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2019).”
- CoReD: Generalizing Fake Media Detection with Continual Representation using Distillation (2021, unknown): “In addition, to address catastrophic forgetting in class-incremental learning, rehearsal [7] principle as well as KD loss were proposed by Rebuffi et al.”
- Overcoming Negative Transfer: A Survey (2020, background): “Chen et al. [85] discovered that features with small singular values have low transferability during deep network fine-tune process.”
- Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuning (2021, methodology): “However, they suffer from the issue of negative transfer [9], since downstream tasks are often different from the pre-training contrastive task.”
- Decoupled Mixup for Data-efficient Learning (2022, unknown): “Besides the vanilla Fine-Tuning baseline, we compare current state-of-the-art TL methods, including BSS (Xinyang et al., 2019), Co-Tuning (You et al., 2020), and Self-Tuning (Ximei et al., 2021).”
- Deep Learning for Visual Tracking: A Comprehensive Survey (2019, background): “learning penalties [257], batch spectral shrinkage [258], or lifelong learning [259].”
- A Survey on Negative Transfer (2020, background): “3) Interpretable Positive Transfer: The interpretability of TL is challenging and rarely studied, especially for neural network based approaches [97].”