Automated 3‐D crack growth simulation

By B. J. Carter, P. Wawrzynek, Anthony R. Ingraffea. 2000

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6203dfed1a51e60de516209a1d7bc9d42ddbbaf7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

Application of Particle Methods to Static Fracture of Reinforced Concrete Structures (2006, background): “(Potyondy et al., 1995; Bittencourt et al., 1996; Carter et al., 2000 )), but three dimensional problems with multiple cracks appear to be very challenging by these methods.”
Numerical simulation of dynamic fracture using finite elements with embedded discontinuities (2009, methodology): “We refer among others to Dally (1979), Ravi-Chandar and Knauss (1984a,b), Knauss and Ravi-Chandar (1985), Ramulu and Kobayashi (1985), Fineberg et al. (1991), Satoh (1996), Sharon and Fineberg (1996, 1999), Fineberg and Marder (1999), and references therein, for a discussion of some experimental obs”
Isogeometric boundary element methods for three dimensional static fracture and fatigue crack growth (2017, methodology): “Commercial packages based on BEM are BEASY [49] and FRANC3D [8].”
Three‐dimensional non‐planar crack growth by a coupled extended finite element and fast marching method (2008, methodology): “Some of the prominent numerical methods used for planar and non-planar crack growth in three dimensions are: finite element methods [12, 13], boundary element-based techniques [14–19], and boundary integral equations [20, 21].”
Fatigue crack propagation of multiple coplanar cracks with the coupled extended finite element/fast marching method (2003, methodology): “Some of the prominent numerical methods used for modeling fatigue crack growth are: finite element and boundary element methods [15,21,6,11,7], boundary integral equations [42], finite element alternating method [41,26], and the dislocation distribution approach [18,9].”
Symmetric‐Galerkin BEM simulation of fracture with frictional contact (2003, background): “[6] and that recent nite element work on meshless [7] and eXtended FEM (X-FEM) [8, 9] methods avoid explicit remeshing of the crack.”
Numerical simulation of multiple 3D fracture propagation using arbitrary meshes (2011, methodology): “An important step in the extension of the existing 2D fracture propagation method is to formulate a 3D geometric representation of the cracks [8].”
Finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the modeling of failure in solids (2007, background): “Numerous adaptive finite element techniques can be found in the literature (see [2–5] among others) as well as the use of cohesive elements embedded between the elements of the underlying mesh (see [6–8] and references therein).”
A new generalized finite element method for two‐scale simulations of propagating cohesive fractures in 3‐D (2015, background): “This approach, however, inherently exhibits solutions that dependent on the finite element mesh due to restricted paths of the discontinuity, thus potentially requiring adaptive refinement techniques at the macro scale [17–20].”
On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods (2010, methodology): “Boundary element methods (BEM), as stand-alone packages or coupled to FEM are successful techniques to model crack propagation, mainly in the context of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) [26,32,82].”
Three-dimensional crack growth with hp-generalized finite element and face offsetting methods (2010, methodology): “A similar sequence of steps is also performed in the research codes that use the standard FEM for fatigue crack growth assessment such as FRANC3D [ 8 ], ADAP-CRACK3D [61] and Zencrack [80].”
Extended finite element method and fast marching method for three-dimensional fatigue crack propagation (2003, methodology): “Among them, the finite element and boundary element methods [5] [9] [12] [18], the finite element alternating method [22] [35], and the dislocation distribution approach [8] [15] are prominent.”
New finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities in the finite deformation range (2008, methodology): “This approach makes, however, the resolution of the propagating discontinuity highly dependent on the mesh alignment, an effect that can be diminished through adaptive refinement techniques; see [19,13,42,32], among others, for the adaptive finite element modeling of cracks and similar failures.”