2MASS wide field extinction maps. I. The Pipe nebula

By Marco Lombardi, Joao F. Alves, C. Lada. 2006

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context. Aims. We present a $8^\circ\times6^\circ$, high resolution extinction map of the Pipe nebula using 4.5 million stars from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) point source catalog. Methods. The use of Nicer (Lombardi & Alves 2001, A&A, 377, 1023), a robust and optimal technique to map the dust column density, allows us to detect a $A_{\rm V} = 0.5~\mbox{mag}$ extinction at a 3- σ level with a $1~\mbox{ arcmin}$ resolution. Results. ( i ) We find for the Pipe nebula a normal reddening law, $E(J - H) = (1.85 \pm 0.15) E(H - K)$. ( ii ) We measure the cloud distance using Hipparchos and Tycho parallaxes, and obtain $130^{+24}_{-58}~\mbox{ pc}$. This, together with the total estimated mass, $10^4~{M}_\odot$, makes the Pipe the closest massive cloud complex to Earth. ( iii ) We compare the Nicer extinction map to the NANTEN ${}^{12}$CO observations and derive with unprecedented accuracy the relationship between the near-infrared extinction and the 12 CO column density and hence (indirectly) the 12 CO X-factor, that we estimate to be $2.91 \times 10^{20}~\mbox{cm}^{-2}\,\mbox{K}^{-1}\,\mbox{km}^{-1}\,\mbox{s}$ in the range $A_{\rm V} \in [0.9, 5.4]~\mbox{mag}$. ( iv ) We identify approximately 1500 OH/IR stars located within the Galactic bulge in the direction of the Pipe field. This represents a significant increase of the known numbers of such stars in the Galaxy. Conclusions. Our analysis confirms the power and simplicity of the color excess technique to study molecular clouds. The comparison with the NANTEN ${}^{12}$CO data corroborates the insensitivity of CO observations to low column densities (up to approximately $2~\mbox{mag}$ in  A V ), and shows also an irreducible uncertainty in the dust-CO correlation of about $1~\mbox{mag}$ of visual extinction.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61f268743992c3eaa9c4a42c459034449f720597

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Ralf Klessen
  2. Mark R. Krumholz
  3. Christoph Federrath
  4. N. Evans II
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. S. Glover
  7. P. Myers
  8. P. Hennebelle

In Instrumentation

  1. Ralf Klessen
  2. N. Evans II
  3. Christoph Federrath
  4. Mark R. Krumholz
  5. P. Myers
  6. S. Glover
  7. C. McKee
  8. C. Lada

Citations in the corpus