Comparison of temperature effects on soil respiration and bacterial and fungal growth rates.

By J. Pietikäinen, M. Pettersson, E. Bååth. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2005

757 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61df729548c930700e60d4175e0161e2c087bab9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Rousk
2. Y. Kuzyakov
3. E. Bååth
4. P. Brookes
5. T. Balser
6. D. Wixon
7. Annelein Meisner
8. Gema Bárcenas-Moreno

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Rousk
2. E. Bååth
3. Annelein Meisner
4. Jordi Sardans
5. Romà Ogaya
6. M. Estiarte
7. J. Passioura
8. Josep Peñuelas

In Soil Science

1. Y. Kuzyakov
2. J. Rousk
3. E. Bååth
4. Josep Peñuelas
5. P. Brookes
6. D. Wixon
7. Jordi Sardans
8. T. Balser

Citations in the corpus

• Rhizosphere biology and crop productivity—a review (2006, background): “Pietikäinen et al. (2005) found that both fungi and bacteria in soil grew quickest between 25 and 30◦C, but that fungi were more inhibited above 30◦C than bacteria, and that bacteria were more inhibited by cooler temperatures, regardless of soil type.”
• Adaptation of soil microbial communities to temperature: comparison of fungi and bacteria in a laboratory experiment (2009, methodology): “Temperature response of bacterial and fungal growth The temperature dependency of microbial growth was essentially measured as described by Dı́az-Raviña et al. (1994) and Pietikäinen et al. (2005).”
• Contrasting Soil pH Effects on Fungal and Bacterial Growth Suggest Functional Redundancy in Carbon Mineralization (2009, background): “There are potentially important differences between their properties, however, such as biomass elemental composition (21), nutrient demand (22, 53, 63, 65), turnover rate (54), metal tolerance (52), temperature dependence (51), and food web linkage (33, 37, 46).”
• Global biogeography of fungal and bacterial biomass carbon in topsoil (2020, neutral): “Third, fungi are better adapted to low-temperature conditions than bacteria (Pietikäinen et al., 2005).”
• Investigating biological control over soil carbon temperature sensitivity (2009, background): “…studies that have shown different optima and temperature responses for soils from different climactic regions (Dalias et al., 2001), soil types (Pietikainen et al., 2005), and ecosystem types (Santruckova et al., 2003), we observed differing temperature–response curves for the bacterial…”
• Drought‐resistant fungi control soil organic matter decomposition and its response to temperature (2011, background): “During the temperature cycles microbial communities may have undergone physiological and/or community changes beyond simple kinetics, e.g. temperature-induced stress, reflected in increases in the metabolic quotient at higher temperature (Pietikainen et al., 2005).”
• Prolonged drought changes the bacterial growth response to rewetting (2015, background): “A similar mechanism has furthermore been suggested for the initial decoupling between growth and respiration at higher than optimum growth temperatures (Pietik€ainen et al., 2005).”
• Root exudate components change litter decomposition in a simulated rhizosphere depending on temperature (2006, background): “community at high soil temperatures (Zhang et al. 2005; Pietikainen et al. 2005) or change of”