Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND
By 白井 淳平. 2008
680 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61d540b15e0d1a9fe8549d6ef92a05bc35fb4d94
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- JUNO physics and detector (2021, background): “Only two experiments have measured geoneutrinos so far: KamLAND [105, 106, 107, 108, 109] and Borexino [110, 111, 112, 113].”
- Neutrino oscillations (2013, unknown): “Other important scintillator-based experiments which provided milestone results for the understanding of the neutrino oscillation properties are KamLAND [19] and,more recently, Daya Bay [52], RENO [53], and Double Chooz [54].”
- Observables sensitive to absolute neutrino masses. II (2008, methodology): “nz/∼jaa53 [5] KamLAND Collaboration, S.”
- Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay: 2015 Review (2016, result): “It turns out, after comparing with experimental data, that δm2 > 0 [127].”
- Sterile Neutrino Fits to Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Measurements (2012, background): “Another unstable-isotope-based idea involves the deployment of a radioactive source inside an existing kilotonscale detector [89] such as Borexino [100], KamLAND [3], or SNO+ [101].”