Phase Estimation Methods for Optical Coherent Detection Using Digital Signal Processing

By M. G. Taylor. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2009

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61d1a4eae5718cf536801fc40c20d615d7ef2d89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Murat Uysal
2. Peter J. Winzer
3. Mohammad Ali Khalighi
4. Guifang Li

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Mohammad Ali Khalighi
2. Murat Uysal
3. Admela Jukan
4. Peter J. Winzer
5. Guifang Li
6. René-Jean Essiambre
7. Mohamed-Slim Alouini
8. Joseph M. Kahn

Citations in the corpus

• Survey on Free Space Optical Communication: A Communication Theory Perspective (2014, background): “grated circuits, which have greatly increased the practicality of coherent detection [374], [375].”
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) Methods in Optical Networks: A Comprehensive Survey (2018, background): “mitigation Maximum a posteriori [30]: looks for phase estimates feasible to calculate in real-time.”
• High-Spectral-Efficiency Optical Modulation Formats (2012, background): “to phase noise depends substantially on the underlying detection algorithm and its hardware implementation [67], [77], [78].”
• Advances in High-Speed DACs, ADCs, and DSP for Optical Coherent Transceivers (2014, unknown): “following condition for QPSK modulation format [48]:”
• Recent advances in coherent optical communication (2009, methodology): “In decision-directed carrier-phase estimation [ 20 ,22], the recovered data are assumed to be correct, which is true for systems operating a low bit error rate (BER).”