An Analysis of the Choice to Cash Out Pension Rights at Job Change or Retirement

By M. Hurd, L. Lillard, C. Panis. 2006

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Demography, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61c583b9e365cd8aa39b62b05ba046f400a9b024

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. A. Kapteyn
2. Erzo F. P. Luttmer
3. Jeffrey R. Brown
4. Federica Teppa
5. Monika Bütler
6. Olivia S. Mitchell
7. Anna Lusardi
8. Jing Jian Xiao

In Demography

1. A. Kapteyn
2. Erzo F. P. Luttmer
3. Federica Teppa
4. Monika Bütler
5. Olivia S. Mitchell
6. Anna Lusardi
7. M.C.J. van Rooij
8. Jing Jian Xiao

In General Health Professions

1. Federica Teppa
2. Monika Bütler
3. Olivia S. Mitchell
4. Erzo F. P. Luttmer

Citations in the corpus

• The choice between an annuity and a lump sum: Results from Swiss pension funds ☆ (2007, methodology): “The first one is presented by Hurd et al. (1998), who analyze pension cash-outs in the US using Health and Retirement Survey (HRS) data.”
• Cognitive Constraints on Valuing Annuities (2017, background): “Hurd and Panis (2006) explored payouts from DB plans in the HRS and found peoples’ behavior was consistent with status quo bias.”
• What Determines Annuity Demand at Retirement? (2012, unknown): “16 Hurd and Panis (2006).”