Renyi Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Posterior Sampling
By Joseph Geumlek, Shuang Song, Kamalika Chaudhuri. 2017
64 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Using a recently proposed privacy definition of Renyi Differential Privacy (RDP), we re-examine the inherent privacy of releasing a single sample from a posterior distribution. We exploit the impact of the prior distribution in mitigating the influence of individual data points. In particular, we focus on sampling from an exponential family and specific generalized linear models, such as logistic regression. We propose novel RDP mechanisms as well as offering a new RDP analysis for an existing method in order to add value to the RDP framework. Each method is capable of achieving arbitrary RDP privacy guarantees, and we offer experimental results of their efficacy.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Borja Balle
- Yuqing Zhu
- Yu-Xiang Wang
- Aleksandra Korolova
- Brendan Avent
- Chuan Guo
- D. Sheldon
- Garrett Bernstein
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Yu-Xiang Wang
- Yuqing Zhu
- Antonio A. Ginart
- Andrei Paleyes
- Javier I. González
- D. Sheldon
- Chuan Guo
- James Y. Zou
In Statistics and Probability
- D. Sheldon
- Garrett Bernstein
- Yuqing Zhu
- Borja Balle
- Yu-Xiang Wang
- Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan
- Aleksandra Korolova
- M. Yung
Citations in the corpus
- Subsampled Rényi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountant (2018, methodology): “Our results cover any Rényi differentially private mechanism, including those based on any exponential family distribution (see Geumlek et al., 2017, and our exposition in Appendix I).”
- Differentially-Private "Draw and Discard" Machine Learning (2018, methodology): “…the second – from the similarities between DDML and the shuffling strategy of [6] and privacy amplification by sampling exploited by [32], [47], [1]; for the third – from recent work in differentially private machine learning [1], [20], [37], [50] that benefits from analyses using such relaxations.”
- Automatic Discovery of Privacy–Utility Pareto Fronts (2019, methodology): “This choice is also aligned with recent uses of DP in machine learning where the privacy analysis is conducted under the framework of Rényi DP [39] and the reported privacy is obtained a posteriori by converting the guarantees to standard (ε, δ)-DP for some fixed δ [1, 18, 22, 38, 48].”
- Federated Learning with Bayesian Differential Privacy (2019, background): “vide tight composition theorems, along with some other advantages, but to the best of our knowledge, they are not broadly used in practice compared to traditional DP (although there are some examples [29]). One of the possible reasons for that is interpretability: parameters of (;")-RDP or (;˝)”
- Submix: Practical Private Prediction for Large-Scale Language Models (2022, methodology): “In particular, S UB M IX uses a privacy accounting methodology based on R´enyi divergences similar to that of Geumlek et al. (2017).”
- Differentially Private Bayesian Linear Regression (2019, background): “ sufficient statistic perturbation (SSP) [Foulds et al., 2016, McSherry and Mironov, 2009, Vu and Slavkovic, 2009, Wang, 2018, Zhang et al., 2016], posterior sampling (OPS) [Dimitrakakis et al., 2014, Geumlek et al., 2017, Minami et al., 2016, Wang, 2018, Wang et al., 2015, Zhang et al., 2016], subsa”
- Poission Subsampled Rényi Differential Privacy (2019, background): “, the exponential family mechanisms (Geumlek et al., 2017).”
- Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Exponential Families (2018, methodology): “There is a growing interest in private methods for Bayesian inference [10–14].”