Why do transaction costs of agricultural policies vary

By P. Rørstad, A. Vatn, Valborg Kvakkestad. 2007

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes (2009, methodology): “…Rørstad et al. 2007), but less work has been done on estimating the private TCs of farmers or other stakeholders (Edgell 1998, Falconer 2000, citing Sinabell, Coppens, Skuras and Kumm & Drake (all 1998), Kasterine, et al. 2001, Falconer and Saunders 2002, Vatn et al. 2002, Rørstad et al. 2007).”
An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services (2010, methodology): “The costs of administering the paymentsmay next depend heavily on the type of payment scheme as illustrated by Falconer and Whitby (1999); Falconer and Saunders (2002); Vatn (2002) and Rørstad et al. (2007); Wunder and Alban (2008).”
Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global (2010, background): “Transaction costs may also increase as services are more explicitly defined (Rørstad et al., 2007).”
Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why? (2013, background): “Empirical analyses of environmental policy have generated a further detailed understanding of transaction costs (Buitelaar, 2007; Falconer, 2000, 2002; Falconer and Saunders, 2002; Falconer and Whitby, 1999; Falconer et al., 2001; McCann and Easter, 1999; Mettepenningen and Van Huylenbroeck, 2009; N”