Discriminating between the log-normal and generalized exponential distributions

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Estimation of P[Y < X] for generalized exponential distribution (2005, methodology): “It has been studied extensively by Gupta and Kundu (1999, 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b, 2004), Raqab (2002), Raqab and Ahsanullah (2001), Zheng (2002) and Kundu, Gupta and Manglick (2004) .”
Maximum likelihood estimation under a finite mixture of generalized exponential distributions based on censored data (2012, unknown): “…are Gupta and Kundu (2001a,b, 2002, 2003a,b, 2004, 2007), Raqab (2002), Raqab and Ahsanullah (2001), Raqab and Madi (2005), Jaheen (2004), Kundu and Gupta (2008), Kundu et al. (2005), Sarhan (2007), Zheng (2002), Singh et al. (2008), Kim and Song (2010), Chen and Lio (2010) and Yarmohammadi (2010).”
On families of beta- and generalized gamma-generated distributions and associated inference (2009, background): “The problem of testing whether some given observations can be considered as coming from one of two probability distributions is an old problem in statistics; see [23] and the references contained therein.”
Is Weibull distribution the most appropriate statistical strength distribution for brittle materials (2009, background): “[ 21 ], it is possible to find the probability of correct selection in each case.”
Discriminating Between the Log-Normal and Log-Logistic Distributions (2009, background): “[21] and Kundu, Gupta and Manglick [22] for some of the recent references.”