Shape and gap effects on the behavior of variably confined concrete

By K. Harries, S. Carey. 2003

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress-strain models (2013, result): “However, it has been reported in a number of previous studies that the ultimate strain measured on the FRP shell at the time of FRP hoop rupture (eh,rup) is lower than the ultimate tensile strain of the fibers (ef) or FRP material (efrp) [12,13,15–21].”
FRP-confined concrete members: Axial compression experiments and plasticity modelling (2007, background): “As has been shown by Harries and Carey [24], the lateral strain on the FRP jacket measured at the middle of the side is about 4.5 times higher than the strain at the edges of the section.”
Hoop strains in FRP-confined concrete columns: experimental observations (2015, background): “A number of factors contributing to lower efficiency in FRP jackets have been identified in previous studies [3, 5, 6, 8, 10–20], which include: (i) the differences between FRP jackets and flat coupons as a result of differences in fabrication processes and in situ forms; (ii) the differences in met”
Axial Compressive Behavior of Circular High-Strength Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes (2014, result): “This finding is in agreement with those previously reported on the size effect of FRP-wrapped NSC cylinders (Carey and Harries 2003; Wang and Wu 2011; Liang et al. 2012).”