An interleaved hop-by-hop authentication scheme for filtering of injected false data in sensor networks

By Sencun Zhu, Sanjeev Setia, Sushil Jajodia, Peng Ning. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy : Proceedings, 2004

689 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/616a336284b7355837a2c078f077f8e4c665b39d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Daniela Rus
2. Qun Li
3. Peng Ning

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Jaydip Sen
2. Peng Ning
3. Sencun Zhu
4. Sushil Jajodia
5. Sanjeev Setia
6. Donggang Liu
7. Kia Makki
8. Niki Pissinou

Citations in the corpus

• Countermeasures Against Traffic Analysis Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks (2005, background): “However, mechanisms exist currently that allow intermediate nodes to lter out forged aggregation data, e.g. see [24, 26 ].”
• A Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Security (2009, background): “The proposed IDs protocols in the literature focus on filtering injected false information only [28,83,141].”
• Establishing pairwise keys in distributed sensor networks (2005, background): “[Zhu et al. 2004] proposed an interleaved hop-by-hop authentication to defeat malicious data injection in sensor net­works.”
• LEAP+: Efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks (2006, background): “2006], preventing false data injection attacks [Ye et al. 2004; Zhu et al. 2004], detecting node replication attacks [Parno et al.”
• A survey of security issues in wireless sensor networks (2006, methodology): “• The proposed IDS protocols in literature focus on filtering injected false information only [ 11 , 94, 104].”
• Global clock synchronization in sensor networks (2006, methodology): “To enforce the correct execution of the operations, we assume the basic cryptographic operations presented in [32], [ 33 ].”
• Sensor network security: a survey (2009, methodology): “in [130] propose an interleaved hop-byhop authentication (IHA) scheme in which at least t + 1 sensor nodes have to endorse a report before it is sent to the base station, where t is the node compromise threshold.”
• SDAP: a secure hop-by-Hop data aggregation protocol for sensor networks (2006, background): “Several other works [Ye et al. 2004; Zhang and Cao 2005; Zhu et al. 2004] also proposed various solutions to prevent false data injection attacks in sensor networks.”
• LEAP: efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks (2003, background): “Some of the other related works on sensor network security include secure data aggregation [Hu and Evans 2003; Przydatek et al. 2003; Yang et al. 2006], preventing false data injection attacks [Ye et al. 2004; Zhu et al. 2004 ], detecting node replication attacks [Parno et al. 2005] and Sybil attac”
• A Review of False Data Injection Attacks Against Modern Power Systems (2017, background): “[42] proposed an interleaved hop-by-hop authentication scheme to help the base station detect injected false data packets.”
• Efficient aggregation of encrypted data in wireless sensor networks (2005, background): “Most prior w ork has fo cused on ultra-ecien t k ey managemen t, authen tication, routing and DoS resistance [1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. An o v erview of securit y related issues and services required for WSNs is pro vided b y P errig, et al. in [5 ].”