Advanced monitoring of machining operations
By Roberto Teti, Krzysztof Jemielniak, Garret E. O'Donnell, David A. Dornfeld. 2010
1,359 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/612c50248d87ae395a06a77d4792ab447d932545
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- R. Paurobally
- Arjan Siddhpura
- Munish Kumar Gupta
- David A. Dornfeld
- Roberto Teti
- Krzysztof Jemielniak
- Tomasz Urbanski
- Vishal S. Sharma
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Arjan Siddhpura
- R. Paurobally
- Robert X. Gao
- David A. Dornfeld
- Soundar Kumara *
- M. Mori
- Krzysztof Jemielniak
- Roberto Teti
In Mechanical Engineering
- R. Paurobally
- Arjan Siddhpura
- D. Pimenov
- Munish Kumar Gupta
- David A. Dornfeld
- Roberto Teti
- Krzysztof Jemielniak
- Mustafa Kuntoğlu
Citations in the corpus
- Artificial intelligence systems for tool condition monitoring in machining: analysis and critical review (2022, background): “In order to exclude a catastrophic tool failure (Pan et al., 2021), it is necessary to track the progress of wear of the cutting tool from the beginning (Teti et al., 2010).”
- Cloud-enabled prognosis for manufacturing (2015, background): “An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) provides an estimated output result for the remaining useful life of a machine or component based on measured condition-monitoring data or event data rather than a physical understanding of the wear or failure mechanism [19].”
- Tool condition monitoring based on numerous signal features (2011, positive): “It is generally acknowledged that reliable process condition monitoring based on a single signal feature (SF) is not feasible [1].”
- A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process (2012, methodology): “Teti et al. [12] reviewed various AE techniques [94 – 96] applied for tool wear monitoring and proposed that due to a wide sensor dynamic range, AE can detect most of the phenomena in machining, although significant data acquisition and signal processing is required.”