Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests.

By C. Preston, J. A. Trofymow, the Canadian Intersite Decomposition Experiment Working Group. 2000

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/611ae70ba52a55deb2994cf69c9191fc4996211e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Lennon
2. Tim R. Moore
3. Liza E. Pfaff

In Insect Science

1. J. Lennon

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. C. Prescott
2. J. Lennon
3. Tim R. Moore
4. A. Baselga
5. I. Kühn
6. B. Hawkins
7. D. Zelený
8. Hanna Tuomisto

Citations in the corpus

• Source and supply of terrestrial organic matter affects aquatic microbial metabolism (2005, background): “…of plant material differs among taxonomic groups (Likens & Bormann 1970) and these differences are often reflected in the local soil organic matter (Preston & Trofymow 2000, Finzi et al. 2001, Quideau et al. 2001) because of litterfall, root exudation and local microbial interactions (Kalbitz et…”
• Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climate (2002, methodology): “1989, 1991) and the 3-year results of this study (Moore et al. 1999; Preston et al. 2000) found that ratio of the acidunhydrolyzable residue to nitrogen (AUR/N) was the best single litter-quality predictor of litter decomposition.”