DNA barcoding of Pacific Canada’s fishes

By D. Steinke, Tyler S. Zemlak, J. Boutillier, Paul D. N. Hebert. 2009

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6117da2a72e473f3b650a355c2768600dd0237c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Philippe Archambault
2. A. Radulovici
3. D. Steinke
4. Junbin Zhang
5. Robert H. Hanner
6. R. Collins
7. P. Møller
8. Laura Boykin

In Molecular Biology

1. Philippe Archambault
2. A. Radulovici
3. D. Steinke
4. Robert H. Hanner
5. Junbin Zhang
6. R. Collins
7. P. Møller
8. Laura Boykin

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Philippe Archambault
2. A. Radulovici
3. D. Steinke
4. Robert H. Hanner
5. Junbin Zhang
6. R. Collins
7. P. Møller
8. Laura Boykin

Citations in the corpus

• DNA Barcodes for Marine Biodiversity: Moving Fast Forward? (2010, background): “) but less so in fish [83] or marine crustaceans [58].”
• Biodiversity of arctic marine fishes: taxonomy and zoogeography (2011, methodology): “Conversely, within-species variation for most taxa was low (adjusted mean, 0.3%; range 0–3.5%), matching the lowest levels of conspecific variation reported in barcoding studies on fishes (Ward et al. 2005; Hubert et al. 2008; Steinke et al. 2009; Zemlak et al. 2009).”
• Cryptic speciation and the circumpolarity debate: A case study on endemic Southern Ocean octopuses using the COI barcode of life (2011, background): “Potential uses of barcoding include identifying the full range of known species, highlighting previously overlooked species and enabling identifications through molecular methods (Hebert et al., 2003, 2004a; Ward et al., 2005; Bucklin et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2008; Steinke et al., 2009a).”
• Barcoding's next top model: an evaluation of nucleotide substitution models for specimen identification (2012, background): “…groups including butterflies (Hajibabaei et al. 2006; Lukhtanov et al. 2009; Dincă et al. 2011), birds (Kerr et al. 2009a, b, 2007; Johnsen et al. 2010), fishes (Ward et al. 2005; Hubert et al. 2008; Rasmussen et al. 2009; Wong et al. 2009; Steinke et al. 2009a,b) and bats (Francis et al. 2010).”
• DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan (2011, background): “Mitochondrial COI gene, as an attractive “species barcode”, its high efficiency in species identification has been reported in Australia marine fishes (Ward et al., 2005), Canadian freshwater fishes (Hubert et al., 2008) and ornamental fishes in the market of North America (Steinke et al., 2009b).”