Funds and Games: The Economics of European Cohesion Policy. ENEPRI Occasional Paper No. 3, October 2003

By S. Ederveen, J. Gorter, R. D. Mooij, R. Nahuis. 2003

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union Structural Funds on regional growth (2017, background): “The estimated effectiveness of the funds is also conditional upon such characteristics in the primary studies (Ederveen et al., 2002, 2006; Esposti & Bussoletti, 2008; Rodriguez-Pose & Fratesi, 2004).”
Effects of EU Regional Policy: 1989-2013 (2017, unknown): “See Table A1 for details about the data sources.”
The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions (2017, background): “Boldrin and Canova (2001, 2003) suggested that regional policies did not contribute to the process of convergence among European countries, while Ederveen et al. (2002, 2006) found that the effectiveness of the EU regional policy, if any, has been unsatisfactory due to crowding out effects, rent…”
Who Governs EU Cohesion Policy? Deconstructing the Reforms of the Structural Funds (2007, unknown): “The perceived complexity of structural funds programme management in 2000–06 was the cause of significant tensions between the Commission and Member States (Bachtler and Wishlade, 2004) and was also cited in several critical reports commissioned or drafted by Member State governments (Ederveen et al”